Cases 81 - 90 of 173
In Re: Aaron Piercy, etc. v. Wilhelmi, et al
as 2:2016cv00082
Petitioner:
Julie Warkins , Dan Williams and Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc.
Respondent:
Aaron Piercy
Movant:
Grant County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hack v. UNUM
as 3:2016cv00126
Plaintiff:
Julie Anne Hack
Defendant:
UNUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Aries Entertainment, LLC v. Brown et al
as 6:2016cv00028
Plaintiff:
Aries Entertainment, LLC
Defendant:
Julie Brown , Laurie Mahoney and Illumina Productions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Drennen et al
as 2:2016cv00008
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Edward G. Drennen, II, Cathy Drennen, Daniel L. Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7402
USA v. Walton et al
as 3:2015cv00090
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Julie A. Walton and Cedric Walton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Foushee v. Skechers U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00544
Plaintiff:
Julie Foushee
Defendant:
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ronald Tipton et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
Ronald Tipton , Althea Louise Tipton , Ronald W Tipton Jr and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , aaiPharma Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Nichols et al v. Skechers USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00469
Defendant:
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Plaintiff:
Linda Nichols , Donal Lee , Theresa Nixon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franklin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv00052
Plaintiff:
Julie Franklin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Sellers v. City of Earlington et al
as 4:2015cv00045
Plaintiff:
Julie Sellers
Defendant:
City of Earlington and Arthur Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
