Cases 81 - 90 of 246
Miller v. Frederick et al
as 1:2020cv00218
Plaintiff:
John E. Miller
Defendant:
Lt. Ruth Dixon and Sgt. Ronald Frederick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Post v. CSS Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00192
Defendant:
Philip B. Broenniman, Harry J. Mullany, III, IG Design Group PLC and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Post
Stein v. CSS Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00171
Defendant:
Harry J. Mullany, III, William Rulon-Miller, CSS Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019mc00327
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Bennett et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., et al.
as 1:2019cv02126
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hepler, Carletta Williams, Linda Bates and others
Defendant:
Does 1-50, Inclusive and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings LLC et al v. Delchi Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01891
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Kenneth H. Moore, NNVI Investment LLC, Lillian P. Lapa and others
Plaintiff:
AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings LLC and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC
Intervenor:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Miller v. Metzger et al
as 1:2019cv01794
Defendant:
Lt. Franchot Wallace, Major Senato, Dana Metzger and others
Plaintiff:
John E. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2019cv01768
Plaintiff:
Charles Miller and Susan Miller
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller et al v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2019cv01760
Plaintiff:
Heather Miller and Marc Miller
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stein v. Rudolph Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01615
Plaintiff:
William Stein
Defendant:
John R. Whitten, Rudolph Technologies, Inc., Jeffrey A. Aukerman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
