Cases 81 - 90 of 191
CAGER v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86313
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., IMO INDUSTRIES, MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
GRIFFIN CAGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARCHIE v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86279
Defendant:
AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE USA, INC., EXXON MOBIL CORP., BURNS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERT W. ARCHIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HINES v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86318
Defendant:
VIACOM, INC., OAKFABCO, INC., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
E.C. HINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TALLEY v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86373
Defendant:
MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., VIACOM, INC., D.B. RILEY, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
QUINCY L. TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAYLOR v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86375
Defendant:
IMO INDUSTRIES, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, BURNS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ERNEST R. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VANCE v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86381
Defendant:
MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., CRANE COMPANY, EXXON MOBIL CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
SARAH MAE VANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86389
Defendant:
EXXON MOBIL CORP., D.B. RILEY, INC., JOHN CRANE and others
Plaintiff:
ROY L. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRANT v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86309
Defendant:
EXXON MOBIL CORP., BECHTEL CORPORATION, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ODIE GRANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KNIGHT v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86333
Defendant:
MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., BURNS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION, CRANE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GLENN v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86307
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, BURNS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
DENNIS GLENN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
