Cases 81 - 90 of 605
ALDF v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16097
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16091
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
ALDF v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16098
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION and others
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16094
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA, STATE OF ARIZONA, ex rel. the Arizona Game and Fish Commission and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16093
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
ALDF v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16100
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Environmental Protection Information Center et al v. van Atta et al
as 3:2022cv03520
Plaintiff:
Environmental Protection Information Center and Friends of the Shasta River
Defendant:
Alicia van Atta, Jim Simondet and National Marine Fisheries Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Conservation Council for Hawaii v. National Marine Fisheries Service
as 1:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
Conservation Council for Hawaii and Michael Nakachi
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Gina Raimondo
Intervenor Defendant:
Hawaii Longline Association
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Vaeth et al v. Raimondo et al
as 4:2022cv10051
Plaintiff:
Scott Vaeth, Miss Shell Seafood, Inc. and Grey Ghost Fishing, Inc.
Defendant:
Gina Raimondo, National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, and National Marine Fisheries Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
A.P. BELL FISH COMPANY, INC. et al v. RAIMONDO et al
as 1:2022cv01260
Plaintiff:
A.P. BELL FISH COMPANY, INC., SOUTHERN OFFSHORE FISHING ASSOCIATION, INC. and GULF OF MEXICO REEF FISH SHAREHOLDERS' ALLIANCE
Defendant:
GINA RAIMONDO, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1801 Fishery Conservation and Management Act (FCMA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
