Cases 81 - 90 of 143
TAYLOR v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86375
Defendant:
IMO INDUSTRIES, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, BURNS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ERNEST R. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86376
Defendant:
MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., VIACOM, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
EQUILA THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRAVIS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86378
Defendant:
OAKFABCO, INC., VIACOM, INC., EXXON MOBIL CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
HOWARD LEE TRAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRAVIS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86379
Defendant:
3M, ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., BECHTEL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIE B. TRAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THROWBRIDGE v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86380
Defendant:
MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., BECHTEL INC. doing business as BECHTEL INC. OF NEVADA also known as C & I GIRDLER COMPANY INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BECHTEL, INC., ETC., AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE USA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JERALD THROWBRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VANCE v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86381
Defendant:
MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., CRANE COMPANY, EXXON MOBIL CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
SARAH MAE VANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALLACE v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86383
Defendant:
3M, IMO INDUSTRIES, CRANE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY M. WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86389
Defendant:
EXXON MOBIL CORP., D.B. RILEY, INC., JOHN CRANE and others
Plaintiff:
ROY L. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODWARD v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86391
Defendant:
AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE USA, INC., JOHN CRANE, BECHTEL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
BERTHA WOODWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURDOCK v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86275
Defendant:
3M, JOHN CRANE, MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
GLENN MURDOCK
Respondent:
T H AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
