Cases 81 - 90 of 3,611
Coulter v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv06480
Plaintiff:
Diedra Coulter
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Dabney v. O'Malley
as 5:2023cv06498
Plaintiff:
Charles Bernard Dabney, III
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF) and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Aguirre v. O'Malley
as 3:2023cv06716
Plaintiff:
Imelda Aguirre
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and Martin J. O'Malley
Not Yet Classified:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Perry v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv06238
Plaintiff:
Alex Perry
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Blackwell v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv05893
Plaintiff:
Apollo Silas Blackwell
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sobieraj v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv06090
Defendant:
Kenneth Sobieraj, Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hemmingway v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv05863
Plaintiff:
Denitra Hemmingway
Defendant:
Kilolo, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Kijakazi, SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF) and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Beverly v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv05695
Plaintiff:
Francois Rene Beverly
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Eaden v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv05705
Plaintiff:
Teri L. Eaden
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
v. Gray
as 4:2023cv06721
Defendant:
Mr. Dereke Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
