Cases 81 - 90 of 282
Waguespack v. Westlake Chemical Corporation
as 3:2018cv01040
Plaintiff:
Clinton Paul Waguespack
Defendant:
Westlake Chemical Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Paul v. T & D Solutions L L C et al
as 1:2018cv01130
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D. Paul and Jonathan D Paul
Defendant:
T&D Solutions, LLC, Volt Power, LLC, T & D Solutions L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Collier, et al v. Medcare Investment Corporation, et al
as 2:2018cv05387
Plaintiff:
Collene Collier , Karen Groce and Barry Kusnick
Defendant:
MedCare Investment Corporation, Cardiovascular Care Group, Inc. , CCG of Louisiana, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
DePriest v. Louisiana State
as 2:2018cv05072
Plaintiff:
Kimberly DePriest
Defendant:
Louisiana State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Horner v. Sid Richardon Carbon, Ltd. et al
as 3:2018cv00320
Defendant:
David Amond and Sid Richardon Carbon, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
John Horner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Submar, Inc. v. Edwards, et al
as 2:2018cv02429
Plaintiff:
Submar, Inc.
Defendant:
Mojave Earth Solutions, Inc. and Robert Winfield Edwards
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Muniz v. Mike Hooks L L C
as 2:2018cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jessica Muniz
Defendant:
Mike Hooks L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bonton v. Louisiana Department of Labor, Louisiana Workforce Commission
as 3:2018cv00192
Plaintiff:
Patricia A Bonton
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Labor, Louisiana Workforce Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Champagne v. Maenza et al
as 2:2018cv00883
Plaintiff:
Jean M Champagne
Defendant:
Michael Maenza , Swegs Kitchen L.L.C and Swegs Development L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Owens et al
as 3:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
AirGas USA LLC, Kristen Broeks-Owens and Darrell Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
