Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Finegan v. Luethje et al
as 6:2023cv01867
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Finegan, Jennifer L. Finegan, Jennie Flatley-Lynn and others
Defendant:
Scott Edward Thomas Luethje, Officer Santiago, Officer Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rushing v. Salaman et al
as 8:2022cv01143
Plaintiff:
Carla L. Rushing
Defendant:
Krystal Salaman, Ashley Blue, Douglas Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Bailey et al
as 1:2018cv21724
Plaintiff:
Mike E. Neal
Defendant:
Jenny Bailey, J. Botner, J. Guerra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Bailey et al
as 1:2018cv21526
Plaintiff:
Mike E. Neal
Defendant:
Jenny Bailey, J. Mendez, Fernando Blanco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCown v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00415
Petitioner:
Jennie L. McCown
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Neal v. Dolce et al
as 1:2018cv20693
Plaintiff:
Mike E. Neal
Defendant:
V. Dolce, C. Auridien, A. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Washington et al
as 1:2018cv20440
Plaintiff:
Mike E. Neal
Defendant:
Rodney C. Washington, J. Mendez, D. Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Wilson et al
as 1:2018cv20374
Plaintiff:
Mike E. Neal
Defendant:
L. Wilson, D. Celeide, E. Cabarco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCown v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00052
Petitioner:
Jennie L. McCown
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCown v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2017cv00596
Petitioner:
Jennie L. McCown
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
