Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Lucky D et al v. Prager Metis LLP et al
as 1:2023cv23871
Plaintiff:
Lucky D, Jong R.D., How Yuan and others
Defendant:
Prager Metis LLP and Armanino LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lherisson v. Whittington et al
as 1:2023cv22462
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lherisson
Defendant:
R.D. Whittington, Whittington Motor Sports Inc. and Whittington Motor Sports Inc. d/b/a Scottsdale Sports Car Group an Arizona corporation agent of Scottsdale Sports Car Group
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32701 Federal Odometer Act
Gilberti v. Cruz et al
as 0:2021cv61777
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Gilberti, Jr.
Defendant:
Nicholas Cruz, 72 Partners LLC., Christopher Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Gilberti v. Cruz et al
as 0:2021cv61705
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Gilberti, Jr.
Defendant:
Nicholas Cruz, 72 Partners LLC., Christopher Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
R.D. Jones, Stop Experts, Inc. et al v. Carmanah Technologies Corporation et al
as 9:2013cv80695
Plaintiff:
R.D. Jones, Stop Experts, Inc. and RRFB Global, Inc.
Defendant:
Carmanah Technologies Corporation , Carmanah Technologies (US) Corporation and Spot Devices, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Spot Devices, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
R.D. Jones, Stop Experts, Inc. and RRFB Global, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
H & O Food Warehouse, Inc. v. M/Y "SHAKE N BAKE" et al
as 1:2013cv21139
Plaintiff:
H & O Food Warehouse, Inc.
Defendant:
M/Y "SHAKE N BAKE and R.D. Yachts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
R.D. Clifford Associates, Inc. v. 1st Capital Lending, LLC et al
as 9:2008cv80709
Plaintiff:
R.D. Clifford Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
1st Capital Lending, LLC and Joseph Garrahan
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
1st Capital Lending, LLC and Joseph Garrahan
ThirdParty Defendant:
Robert Clifford and R.D. Clifford Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
