Cases 1 - 10 of 60
DAINES et al v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv05359
Plaintiff:
TORY DAINES and SARAH BABB
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
-TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-cv-949
as 3:2024cv00949
Plaintiff:
DISABILITY RIGHTS NEW JERSEY
Defendant:
SARAH ADELMAN, KAITLAN BASTON, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
US LBM OPERATING CO. 2009, LLC v. ONE SOURCE KITCHEN AND BATH, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02487
Plaintiff:
US LBM OPERATING CO. 2009, LLC, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO DIRECT CABINET SALES US LBM, LLC and NEW DIRECT CABINETS LLC (D/B/A DIRECT CABINET SALES)
Defendant:
ONE SOURCE KITCHEN AND BATH, INC., ANTONIOS KOUTSOUBOS, JOE DEMUSSI and others
NELSON et al v. CLAUSSEN et al
as 3:2023cv01896
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL NELSON, SARAH E. HEARN-NELSON and PAULINA GIRALDO-JAMES
Defendant:
DON CLAUSSEN, DEREK DEBREE, MARISHA BARLATHER SIROIS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
NELSON et al v. CLAUSSEN et al
as 2:2023cv01896
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL NELSON, SARAH NELSON and PAULINA GIRALDO-JAMES
Defendant:
DON CLAUSSEN, DEREK DEBREE, MARISHA SIROIS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
PRZYBOROWSKI v. SOUTH JERSEY INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02202
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PRZYBOROWSKI
Defendant:
SOUTH JERSEY INDUSTRIES, INC., JOSEPH M. RIGBY, SARAH M. BARPOULIS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
