Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv06145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
O'DONNELL v. WARNER CHILCOTT CORPORATION et al
as 3:2013cv02945
Defendant:
WARNER CHILCOTT CORPORATION, WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WARNER CHILCOTT COMPANY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SARAH O'DONNELL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
O'DONNELL v. WARNER CHILCOTT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv02945
Defendant:
WARNER CHILCOTT CORPORATION, WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WARNER CHILCOTT COMPANY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SARAH O'DONNELL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
ARCHBOLD et al v. ACCESS TO MONEY ATM CORPORATION et al
as 1:2013cv00158
Plaintiff:
SARAH ARCHBOLD and DONALD MARVIN
Defendant:
ACCESS TO MONEY ATM CORPORATION , JOHN DOES 1-10 and X.Y.Z. CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
ARCHBOLD et al v. SPENCER SAVINGS BANK et al
as 2:2012cv07878
Plaintiff:
SARAH ARCHBOLD and DONALD MARVIN
Defendant:
SPENCER SAVINGS BANK , JOHN DOES 1-10 and X,Y,Z COPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
WILCZYNSKI et al v. REDLING et al
as 3:2012cv04335
Plaintiff:
RONALD S. WILCZYNSKI , TOM SMITH , MICHELLE SMITH and others
Defendant:
PETER M. REDLING, JACKIE SKIPPER BARRIOS, FIROZ SHAIKH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
