Cases 31 - 40 of 40
SUN v. OBAMA BARACK-DOG et al
as 1:2017cv01861
Plaintiff:
XIU JIAN SUN
Defendant:
OBAMA BARACK-DOG, P. DAVIS OLIVER, BENJAMIN C. MIZER and others
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1006
CHAPMAN v. HEATH et al
as 1:2017cv01735
Plaintiff:
LAMAR CHRISTOPHER CHAPMAN, III
Defendant:
L.R. HEATH, BARRY SIERRO, E. BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GANNETT SATELLITE INFORMATION NETWORK, LLC et al v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2017cv01175
Plaintiff:
GANNETT SATELLITE INFORMATION NETWORK, LLC and BRAD HEATH
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
JAMES MADISON PROJECT et al v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2017cv00597
Plaintiff:
JAMES MADISON PROJECT and BRAD HEATH
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
AL-HAWSAWI v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2015cv01257
Petitioner:
MUSTAFA AHMED ADAM AL-HAWSAWI
Respondent:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II , ASHTON B. CARTER , JOSE R. MONTEAGUDO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
AL-ALWI v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2015cv00681
Petitioner:
MOATH HAMZA AHMED AL-ALWI
Respondent:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, ASHTON B. CARTER, KYLE J. COZAD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HEATH et al v. AT&T, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01897
Plaintiff:
TODD HEATH , STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Defendant:
AT&T, INC. , AT&T CORP. , AT&T DATACOMM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY v. THOMAS
as 1:2011mc00454
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Respondent:
HEATH P. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: MS:NoticeR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
HEATH v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv02189
Petitioner:
RUSSELL EUGENE HEATH
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
