Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Eddy et al v. Exactech US, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00426
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Eddy, Tracy Eddy and Jeffery A. Eddy
Defendant:
Exactech US, Inc. and Exactech, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. Affordable Care L L C et al
as 5:2021cv00585
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lee Martin and Martin P D C
Defendant:
Affordable Care LLC and DDS Thomas Kennedy
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Thomas Kennedy and Affordable Care L L C
3Rd Party Defendant:
Crimson Tide Investments L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SE Property Holdings, LLC v. Gibson et al
as 2:2017cv07644
Plaintiff:
SE Property Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Charles Sidney Gibson, Jeffery S. Green and Cecile Garrett Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Rainbow Gun Club Inc. v. Denbury Resources Inc
as 2:2013cv00590
Plaintiff:
Rainbow Gun Club Inc , Lakeside Development Co Inc , Della Miller Broussard and others
Defendant:
Denbury Onshore L L C , Specter Exploration Inc , S K H Energy Partners L P and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
E T C Tiger Pipeline L L C v. 30 Acres, More or Less, Located in DeSoto Parish, Louisiana et al
as 3:2010cv00604
Plaintiff:
E T C Tiger Pipeline L L C
Defendant:
30 Acres, More or Less, Located in DeSoto Parish, Louisiana, Quentin Briggs, Sylvester Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Fitzgerald et al v. Exxon Mobil Corporation
as 5:2009cv01147
Plaintiff:
Kassandra D Fitzgerald, Roland Dee Ronnie Adams, Charles Bamburg and others
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Kinder Morgan Louisiana Pipeline L L C v. Land Calcasieu Parish
as 2:2008cv00447
Plaintiff:
Kinder Morgan Louisiana Pipeline L L C
Defendant:
Land Calcasieu Parish, Helen Titus Erwin Succession, Kelly Irene Talbot Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
