Cases 1 - 10 of 13
JONES v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2016cv02261
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, ELBERT GRIFFIN, DOUGLAS CARLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Ramsey v. USPC
as 15-5121
Petitioner - Appellant:
Charles W. Ramsey
Respondent - Appellee:
United States Parole Commission
RAMSEY, JR. v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2013cv01003
Petitioner:
CHARLES W. RAMSEY, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RAMSEY v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2012cv01910
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD RAMSEY
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR. , THOMAS N. FAUST and US PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RAMSEY v. FAUST et al
as 1:2012cv01818
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD RAMSEY
Respondent:
THOMAS N. FAUST and EDWARD F. REILLY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RAMSEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2009cv01494
Plaintiff:
CHARLES F. RAMSEY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-5241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SHIPLEY v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv00485
Plaintiff:
LLOYD D. SHIPLEY
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DEES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv00206
Plaintiff:
SHANNON DEES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GWYN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2007cv01944
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN ALEXANDER GWYN
Defendant:
SWINSON, LESLIE A PARSONS, TIMOTHY LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
