Cases 11 - 20 of 92
Perez-Rodriguez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Juan Perez-Rodriguez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04226
Plaintiff:
Hector Rodriguez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03106
Plaintiff:
Joyce Rodriguez
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03039
Plaintiff:
Monica Rodriguez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. Bingham et al
as 1:2022cv00986
Defendant:
B&W Cartage Company, Inc., Matthew S. Bingham and B&W Interstate, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jazmin Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Rodriguez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01852
Plaintiff:
Jessica Rodriguez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01560
Plaintiff:
Charles Rodriguez
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01561
Plaintiff:
Henry Rodriguez
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01562
Plaintiff:
Terry Rodriguez
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01157
Plaintiff:
JOSE RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
