Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Austin v. Animatic Media Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv60990
Defendant:
Rosame Santos, Animatic Media Inc., Interactive Art Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Austin v. Animatic Media Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv60985
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Austin
Defendant:
Animatic Media Inc., Interactive Art Services, Inc., Gordon Scott Ownbey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Pointe Santo De Sanibel Condominium Association, Inc. v. Miller
as 2:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Pointe Santo De Sanibel Condominium Association, Inc.
Defendant:
Tanya B. Miller
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0044 Trademark Infringement
Sodamin et al v. Trinity Church, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv20049
Defendant:
Trinity Church, Inc, Trinity Church, Inc. and Vous Church, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sodamin, Magnus Sodamin, Martin Whatson and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Premium Sports Inc. v. Branquinho et al
as 3:2014cv00828
Plaintiff:
Premium Sports Inc.
Defendant:
Jose Eduardo Branquinho , Maria P. Prata , Jose H. Batista and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. LaMara XIV, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00032
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , T/Q Music Inc. , Fort Knox Music, Inc. and others
Defendant:
LaMara XIV, Inc. and Edguard Santos
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
LT'S Benjamin Records, Inc. v. Santos et al
as 1:2012cv23693
Plaintiff:
LT'S Benjamin Records, Inc.
Defendant:
Austin Santos, Flow Factory, Inc., Rafael Antonio Pina Nieves and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
West Coast Medical Management, Inc. v. Bifulco et al
as 8:2009cv02395
Plaintiff:
West Coast Medical Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Santo Steven Bifulco, Neuromuscular Medical Centers of Florida, P.A., Vincent M. Amodio and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
