Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Santos-Acevedo v. Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
as 3:2023cv01427
Plaintiff:
Haydee Santos-Acevedo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Santos v. Commissioner of social security
as 3:2022cv01630
Plaintiff:
Blanca I Santos and Blanca I. Santos
Defendant:
Commissioner of social security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Torres-Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv01000
Plaintiff:
Isaac Torres-Santos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Santos-Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv01265
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Iris M Santos-Santos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Santos Len v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv01941
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Emeli Santos Len and Emeli Santos-Leon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Algarin Santos v. Social Security
as 3:2018cv01823
Plaintiff:
Rosa E. Algarin Santos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv01460
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Pablo Santos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Santos-Acevedo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv01419
Plaintiff:
Haydee Santos-Acevedo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Santos-Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv01351
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Alexis Santos-Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Irizarry-Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv02006
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Santos L. Irizarry-Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
