Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jones v. M.D.C. Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Robert Jones
Defendant:
M.D.C. Holdings Inc., Larry A. Mizel, David D. Mandarich and others
Baker v. Romano et al
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Lewis D. Baker
Defendant:
Pasquale Romano, Rick Wilmer, Roxanne Bowman and others
In Re: Baker Hughes Holdings LLC
as 1:2023mc00482
Petitioner:
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
Respondent:
Baker Hughes Holdings LLC
Baker v. The Attorney General of the State of Delaware et al
as 1:2023cv00433
Petitioner:
Jamie Lynn Baker
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Delaware, State of Delaware and Kimberly Hughey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilhelm v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
AeroJet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., Gail Baker, Marion C. Blakey and others
Lawrence v. Tyme Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01133
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Tyme Technologies, Inc., Douglas A. Michels, Christine D. Baker and others
Ackermann et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00767
Plaintiff:
Kati Ackermann, Nicole Adkins, Angela Agosto and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Andres et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00775
Plaintiff:
January Andres, Simao Anton, Steven Brittain and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Aaron et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00800
Plaintiff:
Andy Aaron, Erlinda Acosta, Vicky Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Abell et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00831
Plaintiff:
Tiarra Abell, Amelita Armendarez, Thomas Ash and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
