Cases 1 - 10 of 15
OLIVER v. USA
as 1:2018cv02289
Petitioner:
DEON OLIVER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02810
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
OLIVE et al v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2017cv00045
Plaintiff:
JOSE MANUEL OLIVE, VINCENT DALE ROSS and DYRIAN STRONG
Defendant:
MARY LOU ROBINSON, CLINTON AVERITTE, BARBARA MELYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHILLIPS v. BOYLE et al
as 1:2016cv00620
Plaintiff:
OLIVER KAREEM PHILLIPS
Defendant:
TERRENCE W. BOYLE and LOUISE W. FLANAGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOLING v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2015cv01623
Plaintiff:
OLIVER M. BOLING
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, PAMELA POSCH, KATHLEEN A. PINER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv01190
Plaintiff:
JASON THOMPSON
Defendant:
U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNKNOWN, E. NEGRON-OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILBERT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv00587
Petitioner:
WALTER LEE GILBERT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and JOHN OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CAMPBELL v. GARDEN CITY GROUP et al
as 1:2015cv00259
Plaintiff:
ROY OLIVER CAMPBELL
Defendant:
GARDEN CITY GROUP, JULIE CHAVEZ, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STODDARD v. DIRECTOR OF THE COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2014cv01338
Petitioner:
KEITH OLIVER STODDARD
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OF THE COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BOLING v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv01576
Petitioner:
OLIVER M. BOLING
Respondent:
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
