Cases 1 - 10 of 571
Frazier, Jr. et al v. X Corp et al
as 1:2024cv02135
Petitioner:
Burgious Frazier, Yosub Kim, Wayne Krug and others
Respondent:
X Corp f/k/a Twitter, Inc, X Holdings Corp f/k/a X Holdings I, INC., X Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 4 Petition to order arbitration; failure to arbitrate
Perez v. Kurian
as 24-1268
Plaintiff:
JESSWILL PEREZ
Defendant:
C.O. EBBI KURIAN and C.O. JOHN LACAGNINA
National Labor Relations Board v. MPStar Professionals, LLC
as 24-1204
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
MPSTAR PROFESSIONALS, LLC, and it's alter ego, Christian Perez, CEO and CLEANING PROS BY MPSTAR PROS, LLC, Christian Perez, CEO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Rodriguez (Fernandez Colon)
as 24-1157
Defendant:
ERIC MANUEL FERNANDEZ COLON, ABEL MONTILLA, DANIEL RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smith v. Ebanks
as 24-1097
Not Yet Classified:
AHTWANA SMITH and LAKUAN EBANKS
Defendant:
ROC NATION LLC, CEO Desiree Perez, REFORM ALLIANCE, CEO Robert Rooks, DAMON DASH and others
United States of America v. Perez (Peralta-Fernandez)
as 24-937
Defendant:
JUAN PERALTA, ALFREDO ROSA, MELVIN CASADO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bustos-Perez v. Garland
as 24-746
Petitioner:
DIANA CAROLINA BUSTOS-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Saracina v. Haendiges
as 24-518
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. SARACINA
Defendant:
DEBORAH A. HAENDIGES, SHELIA O'SULLIVAN THIE, JOHN J. FLYNN, Erie Co. District Attorney and others
Tabora-Perez v. Garland
as 24-659
Petitioner:
JOSEFA TABORA-PEREZ, EDWIN SABILLON-TABORA and VICTORIA SABILLON-TABORA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
