Cases 1 - 10 of 155
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Juana Alonzo-Perez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3146
Petitioner:
JUANA ALONZO-PEREZ and JUANA ALONZO-ALONZO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Maria Gonzalez Perez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2811
Petitioner:
MARIA ANGELICA GONZALEZ PEREZ, J. A. P. G., a minor, A. P. G., a minor and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Brenda Organiz-Perez De Lorenzo, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2767
Petitioner:
BRENDA BEATRIZ ORGANIZ-PEREZ DE LORENZO, C. E. L-O. and L. B. L-O.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
USA v. Constantino Romano
as 23-2540
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CONSTANTINO PEREZ ROMANO
In Re: Tepezza Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2023cv03568
In Re:
TEPEZZA MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
Daniel Weibel, Lisa Christian Nethery, Donna Walker and others
Defendant:
Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Williams et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv03581
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams, Lucy Parsons Labs, Daniel Ortiz and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago, David O'Neal Brown, Nicholas Evangelides and others
Petitioner:
SoundThinking, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. David Perez
as 22-3282
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID PEREZ
Campos-Reyes et al v Jaddou
as 2:2022cv01086
Plaintiff:
Sheila Campos-Reyes and Gustavo Vargas-Perez
Defendant:
Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
