Cases 1 - 10 of 13
THOMPSON v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2017cv02603
Plaintiff:
RICHARD THOMPSON
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORTON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2017cv01112
Plaintiff:
WALTER BERNARD MORTON, JR.
Defendant:
J. PATRICIA WILSON-SMOOT, MARK TANNER, SCOTT KUDIC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNN v. TANNER et al
as 1:2016cv01341
Plaintiff:
KEITH DUNN
Defendant:
MARK TANNER, STEVEN BRUNSON, CHARLES WADE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Felipe Fowlke
as 13-5155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Felipe Oteze Fowlkes
Defendant - Appellee:
Barack Obama, President, Nancy Pelosi, U.S. House of Representative, John A. Boehner, U.S. House of Representative and others
FOWLKES v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2013mc00507
Plaintiff:
FELIPE OTEZE FOWLKES
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, NANCY PELOSI, JOHN A. BOEHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABDULLAH v. LYONS et al
as 1:2013cv00371
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD MUSTAFA ABDULLAH
Defendant:
CHARLIE LYONS, TANNER and D. RIEFUR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barry Martin v. USA, et al
as 12-5206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Barry Bernard Martin
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General, United States Marshals Service and others
MARTIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01315
Plaintiff:
BARRY BERNARD MARTIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , ERIC HOLDER, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Hemmings v. USA, et al
as 09-5175
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher D. Hemmings
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Adam Michael Abensohn, Sean Thomas Haran and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
