Cases 1 - 10 of 170
Lasyone v. Garrett et al
as 3:2024cv00171
Petitioner:
Aaron Bradley Lasyone
Respondent:
Tim Garrett and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Interested Party:
Teri Berkshire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Malay et al
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Money Coleman
Defendant:
Paul Malay and Tim Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beebe v. Garret et al
as 2:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jared Beebe
Defendant:
Tim Garret, Hartman and Agle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Garrett et al
as 2:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Johnson
Defendant:
Tim Garrett, K. LeGrand, Wake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolden v. Davis et al
as 3:2023cv00651
Plaintiff:
Tyler Bolden
Defendant:
Scott Davis, Kara LaGrand, D. Southworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogue v. Davis et al
as 3:2023cv00652
Plaintiff:
Habib Hogue
Defendant:
Scott Davis, Kara LaGrand, D. Southworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. CSL Plasma Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01810
Plaintiff:
Jose Rivera
Defendant:
CSL Plasma Inc., David Mumford, Tim Avila and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Cotton v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv00570
Petitioner:
Ivan Cotton
Respondent:
Tim Garrett and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Wake et al
as 3:2023cv00590
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Smith
Defendant:
N. Wake, Tim Garret and K. Shea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardiman v. Davis et al
as 3:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Andre Hardiman
Defendant:
Scott Davis, Kara LaGrand, Mr. Southworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
