Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Coffman v. RayzeBio, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
RayzeBio, Inc., Richard Heyman, Tim Van Hauwermeiren and others
Taylor v. RayzeBio, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Defendant:
RayzeBio, Inc., Richard Heyman, Tim Van Hauwermeiren and others
Dennis v. Boulos et al
as 1:2022cv01025
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Dennis and Abdul a.m. Shakur
Defendant:
Dr. Tim Boulos, New Castle County Police Department and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dewey v. Cohen et al
as 1:2022cv00894
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dewey
Defendant:
Marc A. Cohen, David Lucchino, Tim Barberich and others
Nominal Defendant:
Frequency Therapeutics, Inc.
Acton et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00844
Plaintiff:
Angle Clark, Tia Robbins, Darla Acton and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Agen et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00837
Plaintiff:
Mathew White, Jamie Agen, Debra Aikey and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Acker et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00836
Plaintiff:
Chris Stuckrath, Cory Acker, Jennifer Anderson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Acly et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00835
Plaintiff:
Christopher Acly, Tim Altaner, Hasan Altimimi and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
King et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00812
Plaintiff:
Erika King, Nona King, William King and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Abner et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00810
Plaintiff:
Carl Abner, Donna Adair, Jason Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
