Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Wearable Shoe Tree, LLC v. The Individuals, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A
as 1:2023cv24461
Plaintiff:
RIGHTS HOLDER and WEARABLE SHOE TREE, LLC
Defendant:
The Individuals, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A, Aolantai, YoGus Electric and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Audemars Piguet Holding SA et al v. kkkwatch.com et al
as 0:2017cv60517
Plaintiff:
Audemars Piguet Holding SA , Chanel, Inc. , Gucci America, Inc. and others
Defendant:
kkkwatch.com, awwo6211, abloom and others
Respondent:
Payoneer, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. 2015louisvuittonshop.com et al
as 0:2016cv61002
Plaintiff:
Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A.
Defendant:
2015louisvuittonshop.com, 1topbag.com, 2016-designer-bags-australia.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
High Bid, LLC v. Kenneth Everett
as 12-16554
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HIGH BID, LLC, d.b.a. Roebuck Auctions
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH EVERETT
AutoTec LLC v. Auction Access Auto Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00896
Plaintiff:
AutoTec LLC
Defendant:
Auction Access Auto Inc, Bid Auction Access Inc, Bid Auction Access LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
HIGH BID LLC v. EVERETT
as 5:2012cv00059
Plaintiff:
HIGH BID LLC
Defendant:
KENNETH EVERETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marine Bid Exchange, Inc., et al v. Renzo Renzi, et al
as 10-14425
Intervenor - Appellant:
MARINE BID EXCHANGE, INC. and CHARLES M. STEPHENS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
RENZO RENZI, AMADA HOLDINGS, INC., in personam and M/Y AMADA, US. Documentation No. 1155137, it's engines, boats, equipment, machinery, furnishings, apparel and appurtenances, etc., in rem.,
:
SERVICE
Hallicy v. M/V LOW BID et al
as 2:2007cv14044
Plaintiff:
Edward T. Hallicy
Defendant:
M/V LOW BID, Anthony Rosciti, Jr., Anthony Rosciti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
