Cases 1 - 9 of 9
GOLDSBOROUGH v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72106
Plaintiff:
DIANA GOLDSBOROUGH
Defendant:
A C & S, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
E.L. STEBBING, E.L. STEBBING, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., INC. UNIROYAL, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROWN v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72101
Plaintiff:
ALVESTER BROWN
Defendant:
A C & S, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
E.L. STEBBING, E.L. STEBBING, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., INC. UNIROYAL, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DICKERSON v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72105
Plaintiff:
PAUL DICKERSON
Defendant:
A C & S, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
E.L. STEBBING, E.L. STEBBING, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., INC. UNIROYAL, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CHANDLER v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72103
Plaintiff:
DONALD CHANDLER
Defendant:
A C & S, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
E.L. STEBBING, E.L. STEBBING, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., INC. UNIROYAL, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BURNETTE v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72102
Plaintiff:
CONWAY H. BURNETTE
Defendant:
A C & S, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
E.L. STEBBING, E.L. STEBBING, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., INC. UNIROYAL, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
COBB v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72104
Plaintiff:
THOMAS D. COBB, SR.
Defendant:
A C & S, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
E.L. STEBBING, E.L. STEBBING, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., INC. UNIROYAL, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JOHNSON v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv72107
Plaintiff:
GEORGE JOHNSON
Defendant:
A C & S, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
E.L. STEBBING, E.L. STEBBING, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., INC. UNIROYAL, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LIMING et al v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63997
Plaintiff:
JOYCE LIMING, ALVESTER BROWN, CONWAY H. BURNETTE and others
Defendant:
A C & S, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
E.L. STEBBING, E.L. STEBBING, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC., W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., UNIVERSAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
STONE v. POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER CO. et al
as 2:2007cv62756
Plaintiff:
DENNIS J. STONE and DENNIS J. STONE
Defendant:
POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER CO., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A C AND S, INC. and A C AND S, INC.
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST DISTRIBUTION PROCESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
