Cases 1 - 9 of 9
M. et al v. BARR et al
as 5:2019cv03194
Defendant:
SIMONA FLORES, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI and others
Plaintiff:
R.G.A. M. and E.O.A. B.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 070
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv03463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. PENNSYLVANIA CHIROPRACTIC SERVICES CORP. et al
as 2:2016cv01318
Plaintiff:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY , ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY , ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA CHIROPRACTIC SERVICES CORP. , BRIAN ELIAS DCM, LLC , ELIAS CHIROPRACTIC & SPORTS MEDICINE CENTERS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
MATHIS v. BOARD OF PUC et al
as 2:2014cv05651
Plaintiff:
DERRICK MATHIS
Defendant:
BOARD OF PUC, PUBLIC UTILITY COMM, PECO S PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC and others
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
FLORES v. EXPRESS SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2014cv03298
Plaintiff:
JOSE FLORES
Defendant:
EXPRESS SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
FLORES v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv01771
Plaintiff:
JOE FLORES
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC , EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. FLORES et al
as 2:2010cv00609
Plaintiff:
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
PORFIRIO FLORES and J J INC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
PRATER-McCOULLUM v. CHERRY HILL KIA & DODGE et al
as 2:2009cv01353
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER-McCOULLUM
Defendant:
CHERRY HILL KIA & DODGE, FAULKE, P.J. VINCH and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CASTILLO-FLORES v. SOLTZ
as 2:2008cv05256
Plaintiff:
ANDRES CASTILLO-FLORES
Defendant:
JONATHAN SOLTZ and JONATHAN SOLTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
