Cases 1 - 10 of 208
Garcia v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02700
Plaintiff:
Edward Rudy Garcia
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garcia v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65439
Plaintiff:
Peter Garcia
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garcia v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02129
Plaintiff:
Xavier Garcia
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024oe01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Garcia et al. v. Grbac Enterprises LLC et al.
as 1:2024cv00509
Defendant:
Grbac Enterprises LLC, Cleaning Authority of Solon and Elvis Grbac
Plaintiff:
Madeline Garcia, Danielle Raftery and Alicia Hudy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Garcia v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01125
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Garcia
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garcia v. Metlife Legal Plans, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Maria Garcia
Defendant:
Metlife Legal Plans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Garcia v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04118
Plaintiff:
George Garcia
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Davol, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
