Other Statutes Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Crooker v. Popular Mortgage Servicing, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00356
Plaintiff: Michael Alan Crooker
Defendant: Popular Mortgage Servicing, Inc., First Federal Credit Control, JL Russell & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv06155
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv06217
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv05836
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv05647
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gomez v. Mann Bracken, LLP
as 1:2009cv02162
Plaintiff: Ernestina Gomez
Defendant: Mann Bracken, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
June et al v. Mann Bracken, LLP We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02137
Plaintiff: Kim June and Timothy June
Defendant: Mann Bracken, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04967
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Neyhard v. Mann Bracken, LLP
as 1:2009cv02000
Plaintiff: Mary Neyhard
Defendant: Mann Bracken, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Taylor et al v. Mann Bracken, LLP
as 1:2009cv01969
Plaintiff: Lonnie Taylor and Virginia Taylor
Defendant: Mann Bracken, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?