Cases 1 - 10 of 5,181
Watts et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02356
Plaintiff:
Alexis C. Watts and William Ito
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Levi v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02337
Plaintiff:
William Levi
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Farro v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65482
Plaintiff:
William J Farro
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jackson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02302
Plaintiff:
William Jackson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kyse v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02327
Plaintiff:
William V Kyse
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hall v. Board et al.
as 5:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
James William Hall
Defendant:
Anthony Board, Anthony Board, Jr., Todd McKenny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02247
Plaintiff:
Ebony K. Williams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCracken v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02200
Plaintiff:
William McCracken
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Williams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
