Cases 1 - 6 of 6
BALLOU v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv23058
Plaintiff:
LINDA POLLIDORE BALLOU
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES & PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MINOR-ROWAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv21902
Plaintiff:
LINDA POLIDORE BALLOU and KATHLEEN MINOR-ROWAN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BALLOU v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv07763
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
PATRICK BALLOU
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BALLOU v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA LLC et al
as 2:2018cv11765
Defendant:
BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and BMW OF NORTH AMERICA LLC
Plaintiff:
Susan Ballou
Not Classified By Court:
HON. DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH, RET.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
PRINCETON OPHTHALMIC, LLC v. CORINTHIAN OPHTHALMIC, INC. et al
as 3:2014cv05485
Plaintiff:
PRINCETON OPHTHALMIC, LLC
Defendant:
CORINTHIAN OPHTHALMIC, INC. , SKIP BALLOU , SEAN IANCHULEV and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. LEGION PARTNERS ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv06809
Plaintiff:
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
LEGION PARTNERS ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC , BRADLEY VIZI , CHRISTOPHER KIPER and others
Counter_claimant:
LEGION PARTNERS ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC , ROGER BALLOU , BRADLEY VIZI and others
Counter_defendant:
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
