Cases 11 - 20 of 46
USA v. Wade et al
as 2:2015cv00883
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Stanley L. Wade, Janet B. Wade, Cherry Hills UBO and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Cox et al v. Internal Revenue Service
as 5:2015cv01011
Plaintiff:
Robert C Cox and Deborah J Cox
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
United States of America v. Butler et al
as 6:2015cv00346
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Annie S. Butler, Francis C. Short, Oklahoma Employment Security Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
CB International Investments, LLC v. Mary J. Bowles Trust Dated September 23, 1987 et al
as 1:2015cv01105
Defendant:
United States Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service , Mary J. Bowles Trust Dated September 23, 1987, QTIP Trust U/W/O Thomas C. Bowles and others
Plaintiff:
CB International Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Levy et al
as 2:2015mc00207
Movant:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert C. Levy and Nita R. Levy
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
USA v. Hill et al
as 2:2015cv00034
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
David R. Hill, Paula E. Hill, DeeAnne C. Gilgen and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
HP Distribution, LLC et al v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv02549
Petitioner:
HP Distribution, LLC and Tanner C Cunningham
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
United States of America v. Sheffield et al
as 6:2014cv00273
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John C. Sheffield, S & S Holding Company, Inc., Jon-Jo Motels, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
United States of America v. Kelsey
as 2:2014mc00209
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Steven C Kelsey
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Barlow v. USA
as 2:2013cv00844
Plaintiff:
Brian C. Barlow
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6703
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
