Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Koller v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
as 1:2023cv02363
Plaintiff:
James C Koller
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Koller v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
as 3:2023cv03132
Plaintiff:
James C Koller
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Acevedo v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01079
Plaintiff:
Dominique C Acevedo
Defendant:
Marc D Smith, Kamitha Madkins and Illinois Department of Children and Family Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acevedo v. Menez
as 1:2023cv01088
Plaintiff:
Dominique C. Acevedo
Defendant:
Gremlin Menez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Acevedo v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01073
Plaintiff:
Dominique C. Acevedo
Defendant:
Marc D. Smith and Illinois Department of Children and Family Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Acevedo v. Carrara
as 1:2023cv01097
Plaintiff:
Dominique C. Acevedo
Defendant:
Julianne Carrara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Acevedo v. Gonzalez
as 1:2023cv01094
Plaintiff:
Dominique C Acevedo
Defendant:
Lucy Vazquez Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Acevedo v. Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
as 1:2023cv01070
Plaintiff:
Dominique C Acevedo
Defendant:
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Acevedo v. Trent Law Firm et al
as 1:2023cv01096
Plaintiff:
Dominique C. Acevedo
Defendant:
Trent Law Firm and Marc P. Trent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Daniels v. Santos et al
as 1:2022cv06571
Plaintiff:
Tamara C Daniels
Defendant:
Robert L Santos, Marilyn A Sanders, Willie Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
