Cases 31 - 40 of 112
Lampley v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv00279
Plaintiff:
Fred C. Lampley
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pouyadou v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv00171
Plaintiff:
Anthony C. Pouyadou, Jr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sellers v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 5:2013cv00610
Plaintiff:
Janet C Sellers
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lee v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 3:2013cv00315
Plaintiff:
Lovena C. Lee
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Newton v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2012cv03913
Plaintiff:
Wendell C Newton
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Daniels v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00699
Plaintiff:
Ron C. Daniels
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Doss v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 3:2012cv03650
Plaintiff:
Leah C Doss
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TRC v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2012cv03494
Plaintiff:
T R C
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Johnston v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00601
Plaintiff:
Anthony C. Johnston
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Crow v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 3:2012cv02418
Plaintiff:
Rhonda C Crow
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.