Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Crenshaw v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Marion County)
as 5:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
Joseph Crenshaw
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crenshaw v. QBE Specialty Insurance Company
as 6:2023cv02336
Plaintiff:
Eric Crenshaw
Defendant:
QBE Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0635 Breach of Insurance Contract
CRENSHAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv28828
Plaintiff:
BYRON CRENSHAW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRENSHAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv18804
Plaintiff:
EUGENE CRENSHAW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRENSHAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv17712
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CRENSHAW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRENSHAW v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11173
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CRENSHAW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KINARD v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09991
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KINARD, LAYWOOD MOLETTE, JONATHAN OVERFELT and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRENSHAW v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23497
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEE CRENSHAW, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CRENSHAW v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22649
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE CRENSHAW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRENSHAW v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21241
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN CRENSHAW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
