Cases 1 - 10 of 436
Rivera-Cruz v. Garland
as 24-1146
Petitioner:
JENNIFER RIVERA-CRUZ and KEYSHA CRUZ-RIVERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cruz v. Banks
as 24-1147
Plaintiff:
NEYSHA CRUZ, as Parent and Natural Guardian of O.F. and Individually
Defendant:
DAVID C. BANKS and NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Molina-Herrera v. Garland
as 24-1043
Petitioner:
MIRNA ELIZABETH MOLINA-HERRERA and BRIAN ALEXANDER CRUZ-MOLINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Allen v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
as 24-785
Plaintiff:
PETER ALLEN, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, BRIAN BERNARD, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, MARK DANIELS, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
Dr. CAROL MOORES, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, CHUN LEE, MD and others
United States of America v. Cirino
as 24-714
Defendant:
LUIS CIRINO, ANGEL SALINAS, OMAR RIVERA and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Caizan Ramirez v. Garland
as 24-445
Petitioner:
JOHN JAIRO CAIZAN RAMIREZ, ITZEL RAMIREZ-CRUZ, BRANDON ISAAC CAIZAN RAMIREZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Amaya-Sanchez (Hernandez)
as 24-352
Defendant:
EDWIN AMAYA-SANCHEZ, WILLIAMS CASTELLANOS, ELMER ALEXANDER LOPEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cruz v. United States of America
as 24-306
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHAKESPEARE CRUZ
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cruz-Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-139
Petitioner:
ELSY ARACELY CRUZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
