Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Puckett v. Walmart Stores Inc
as 1:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
Fay E Puckett
Defendant:
Walmart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flansburg v. Torkelson
as 2:2015cv00003
Plaintiff:
Skyland Flansburg
Defendant:
Richard E Torkelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adsit v. Black et al
as 2:2014cv00087
Plaintiff:
Charles Adsit
Defendant:
James E Black and JJ Bugs Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Krening v. Union Pacific Railroad
as 2:2013cv00274
Plaintiff:
Henry E Krening
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DuRose et al v. Powell Valley Healthcare Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00216
Defendant:
Powell Valley Healthcare Inc, Powell Hospital District No 1, Powell Valley Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Mindy E DuRose, William K DuRose and A.D.
Intervenor:
State of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Krawisz et al v. Mann
as 2:2013cv00188
Plaintiff:
William E Krawisz, Sr and Nancy J Dougherty
Defendant:
Travis G Mann
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181
Gordon et al v. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
as 1:2013cv00109
Plaintiff:
Robert E Gordon and Sherri L Gordon
Defendant:
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and Beckman Production Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gustafson et al v. Black et al
as 2:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
Andrew Gustafson
Defendant:
James E Black and JJ Bugs LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Hastings et al v. Orthopaedics of Jackson Hole PC et al
as 2:2012cv00253
Plaintiff:
John L Hastings, III and Sarah E Hastings
Defendant:
Orthopaedics of Jackson Hole PC and Peter E Rork
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Langille et al v. Transco Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00189
Plaintiff:
Connie Langille and Paul E Langille
Defendant:
Transco Inc and Keith Peter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
