Labor Cases filed in California
Cases 21 - 30 of 890
Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. OBS Engineering, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv05454
Plaintiff: Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers, Dan Reding and others
Defendant: OBS Engineering, Inc. and Wilmoth G Lewis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Andrew Rodriguez v. S E Pipeline Construction Co et al
as 2:2023cv08769
Plaintiff: Andrew Rodriguez
Defendant: S E Pipeline Construction Co and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Pacific Coast Iron, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv05140
Plaintiff: Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund, Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant: Pacific Coast Iron, Inc. and Adam Murray
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Asphalt Dike Construction, Inc., dba APCO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv04846
Plaintiff: Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund, Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant: Asphalt Dike Construction, Inc., dba APCO and Stacy D. Noriega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Local Union 342 of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada v. R E Milano Plumbing Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv04646
Petitioner: Local Union 342 of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada
Respondent: R E Milano Plumbing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Lopez v. S E Pipe Line Construction Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01626
Plaintiff: Juan Angel Lopez
Defendant: S E Pipe Line Construction Company and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 lm Removal- Labor/Mgmt. Relations
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Vulcan Materials Company et al
as 3:2023cv04507
Plaintiff: Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund, Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant: Vulcan Materials Company, Calmat Company and Calmat Company a Delaware Corporation doing business as Vulcan Materials Company Western Division (Industrial Asphalt)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund et al v. K & G CONCRETE, INC
as 4:2023cv04243
Plaintiff: Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund, Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant: K & G CONCRETE, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California et al v. AM Development Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv04227
Plaintiff: Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California, Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant: AM Development Inc. and Adam Murray
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Carrick v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv04233
Plaintiff: Gabrielle E Carrick
Defendant: Peloton Interactive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Type: Labor Labor: Other

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?