Cases filed in District of Columbia
ROSE v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01556
Plaintiff: Lyndee Rose
Defendant: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER LLC, RASIER-CA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS et al v. PRICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00844
Plaintiff: SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, GILLETTE CHILDREN'S SPECIALTY HEALTHCARE, CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF THE KING'S DAUGHTERS, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant: SEEMA VERMA, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES and THOMAS E. PRICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
PIERCE v. UNITED STATES CONGRESS et al
as 1:2016cv02055
Plaintiff: SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant: UNITED STATES CONGRESS, FEDERAL JUDICIAL COMMISSION, DANE R. GILLETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOPPMANN et al v. GLENN et al
as 1:2011cv01635
Plaintiff: DAVID HOPPMANN and WENDY GILLETTE
Defendant: MARK GLENN and 1726 INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOPPMAN et al v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2010cv01252
Plaintiff: DAVID C. HOPPMAN and WENDY GILLETTE HOPPMAN
Defendant: JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, SHAPIRO AND BURSON, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
COBELL, et al v. SALAZAR , et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:1996cv01285
Plaintiff: ELOUISE PEPION COBELL , THOMAS MAULSON , JAMES LOUIS LAROSE and others
Movant: ELENI M. CONSTANTINE , ROBERTA MCINERNEY , JAMES REGAN and others
Amicu: QUAPAW TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA , NATIONAL CONGRESS OF AMERICAN INDIANS and ASSINIBOINE AND SIOUX TRIBES OF THE FORT PECK INDIAN RESERVATION
Defendant: ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS , KEN SALAZAR , LARRY ECHOHAWK and others
Intervenor: OSAGE NATION , NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND and MARK KESTER BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?