Cases 1 - 10 of 181
Turner v. Maeda et al
as 2:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
John Turner
Defendant:
Patrick Maeda, State of Nevada, Julie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hendrix v. McCoy et al
as 3:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Kimberly McCoy, Tanya Asher, J. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00406
Petitioner:
Gene A. H. Allen
Respondent:
State of Nevada, Warden L.C.C., Aaron Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Nev. (BOP) et al
as 2:2023cv01166
Petitioner:
Gene A. H. Allen
Defendant:
A.G. Aaron Ford
Respondent:
Nev. (BOP), State of Nevada and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Marks et al
as 3:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Timothy H. Johnson
Defendant:
Dana Marks, E Parks, J. Mainwaring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. McCoy et al
as 2:2023cv00705
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
K. McCoy, Tanya Asher, J. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edgerton v. Hillard et al
as 2:2023cv00693
Plaintiff:
Edward H. Edgerton, Jr.
Defendant:
Hillard, W. Hutchings and B. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Womack v. Hanf et al
as 2:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Richard Womack
Defendant:
T. Hanf, T. Manalang, H. Rucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosky v. Gittiere et al
as 3:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
John H. Rosky
Defendant:
W. A. Gittiere, Tim Garrett, K. Widmar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
