Cases 1 - 10 of 966
Tudor DuPont, et al. v. Sterling Family Trust, et al.
as 24-2636
Plaintiff:
AL TUDOR DUPONT and AURELIA ANDERSON
Defendant:
STERLING FAMILY TRUST, ROCHELLE H. STERLING, individually and as sole Trustee of Sterling Family Trust, and as Manager of Beverly Hills Properties LLC, DOES, 1-20, inclusive and others
Diaz v. Moore, et al.
as 24-2512
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, RICHARD ALARCON, RICHARD ALATORRE and others
(PS) Jacobs et al v. The Trustees of Princeton University et al
as 2:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Joel Brendon Jacobs and Kathleen Chambers
Defendant:
The Trustees of Princeton University, Princeton University Investment Co., Christopher Eisgruber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Williams, et al.
as 24-2410
Plaintiff:
PAUL JONES
Defendant:
Warden WILLIAMS, High Desert State Prison, Corrections Officer HILL, High Desert State Prison and HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON
Clair Hills v. Garland
as 24-2267
Petitioner:
EDUARDO CLAIR HILLS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
David Hough et al v. Ryan Carroll et al
as 2:2024cv02886
Plaintiff:
David Hough, Mouloud Hocine, Jennifer Lehmkuhl Hill and others
Defendant:
Ryan Carroll, Max K. Day, Max O. Day and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Bong v. Brown, et al.
as 24-2208
Plaintiff:
JILL BONG
Defendant:
OREGON EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT, OREGON SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION, KATE BROWN, in both her individual and official capacity as Governor of the State of Oregon and others
Franklin Real Estate, L.P. v. F.H.M. Investments
as 5:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
Franklin Real Estate, L.P. a Delaware Limited Partnership doing business as Franklin Family Partnership, L.P.
Defendant:
F.H.M. Investments, Orval L. Hill, Sylvia Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
