Cases 1 - 10 of 461
Holmes v. Groder et al
as 2:2024cv03645
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
Jeffery Scott Groder and Dzurenda E. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Roemer et al
as 6:2024cv06335
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Michael J. Roemer, Paul E. Bonanno, Jeffery L. Bagley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trico Tarek Factory v. Jetax Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03731
Plaintiff:
Trico Tarek Factory
Defendant:
Jetax Inc. and Jeffery Taxier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Alexander v. Groder et al
as 1:2024cv03858
Plaintiff:
Holmes Alexander
Defendant:
Jeffery Scott Groder and Dzurenda E. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gil-Bolivar v. Evans & Paul LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03061
Plaintiff:
Giovanny Gil-Bolivar
Defendant:
Evans & Paul LLC, E&P Holdings 1, LLC and Jeffery Evans
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Master for Clothes Manufacturing and Embroidery v. Jetax Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02409
Plaintiff:
Master for Clothes Manufacturing and Embroidery
Defendant:
Jetax Inc. and Jeffery Taxier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Polowy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Jeffery John Polowy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lakers for Garmets and Made Clothes v. Jetax Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02226
Plaintiff:
Lakers for Garmets and Made Clothes
Defendant:
Jetax Inc. and Jeffery Taxier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
HGM v. Jetax Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02135
Plaintiff:
HGM
Defendant:
Jetax Inc. and Jeffery Taxier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Trico Tarek Factory v. Jetax Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01937
Plaintiff:
Trico Tarek Factory
Defendant:
Jetax Inc. and Jeffery Taxier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
