Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Van Jenkins v. DOJ
as 19-5230
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Van Jenkins
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice
JENKINS et al v. NATIONAL RAILROAD CORPORATION
as 1:2019cv02414
Plaintiff:
ALBERT JENKINS and JODY JOHNSON
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Deangelo Jenkins
as 19-3023
Defendant / Appellant:
Deangelo Tyrone Jenkins
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
ROSS v. JENKINS et al
as 1:2019mc00041
Defendant:
VALUE CREATORS, INC., ROYALL JENKINS, VALUE CREATORS INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KENDRA ROSS
Thomas Jenkins v. United States District Court, et al
as 19-5037
Defendant / Appellee:
United States District Court, Greenbelt, MD and Butner Federal Medical Center
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas K. Jenkins
UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND CURAY RESERVATION v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv00546
Plaintiff:
UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY INDIAN RESERVATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, RYAN ZINKE and others
Movant:
MARY CAROL M. JENKINS, ROGER KOCHAMPANASKEN, TARAH AMBOH and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Van Jenkins v. DOJ
as 17-5046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Van Jenkins
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice
USA, et al v. Bank of America Corporation, et al
as 16-5220
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America N.A., BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, formerly known as Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
Lindsay Jenkins
JENKINS v. MCHUGH et al
as 1:2015cv01413
Plaintiff:
GEORGE MELVIN JENKINS
Defendant:
JOHN M. MCHUGH, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
