Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Darnell Stanley v. Isaac Fulwood, Jr., et al
as 13-5326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darnell Stanley
Defendant - Appellee:
Isaac Fulwood, Jr., Chairman, United States Parole Commission, Lynne Jenkins, Hearing Examiner and others
DUARTE v. VINCENT et al
as 1:2013cv01082
Plaintiff:
MARIO JAIME DUARTE
Defendant:
W. VINCENT, T. JENKINS, D. M. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-5177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Geno Jenkin
as 13-3037
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Geno W. Jenkins
STANLEY v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2013cv00430
Plaintiff:
DARNELL STANLEY
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, LYNNE E. JENKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JENKINS v. US PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2013cv00336
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JENKINS
Defendant:
US PAROLE COMMISSION, OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL, ROCKNE CHICKNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5268
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrell Parks v. Cranston Mitchell, et al
as 11-5358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darrell James Parks
Defendant - Appellee:
Cranston J. Mitchell, Chairman of United States Parole Commission, Patricia K. Cushwa, Chairman of United States Parole Commission, Isaac Fulwood, Jr., Chairman of United States Parole Commission and others
TAYLOR v. FULWOOD
as 1:2011cv01911
Plaintiff:
MILTON JOSEPH TAYLOR
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, L. JENKINS, PAUL HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
