Social Security Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Tibbens v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00359
Plaintiff: Brenda K. Tibbens
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
FIELDS v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv04532
Plaintiff: DORIAN K FIELDS
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
NALLY v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv02876
Plaintiff: KIM K. NALLY
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Selecky v. Kijakazi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01982
Plaintiff: David Selecky
Defendant: K Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WATSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv03851
Plaintiff: DOROTHY K WATSON
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Roher v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00754
Plaintiff: Steven Roher and Steven K. Roher
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Taylor v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00108
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Katrina K. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GROFF v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv06040
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: LORRIE K. GROFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hollinger v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv01133
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Jennifer K. Hollinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Vargas v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01858
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Renee K. Vargas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?