Cases 1 - 10 of 473
Quinn v. Nasera et al
as 2:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Trellis Quinn
Defendant:
Gabriela Nasera, Locher, Jose Navarrete and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hemingway v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Payton Hemingway
Defendant:
K. Williams, B. Gutierrez, JMC Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore v. Deputy Chief Hass et al
as 2:2024cv00247
Petitioner:
Corves K. Gilmore
Defendant:
The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Respondent:
Deputy Chief Hass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Garrett et al
as 2:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Johnson
Defendant:
Tim Garrett, K. LeGrand, Wake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. McCoy et al
as 3:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Kimberly McCoy, Tanya Asher, J. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. Nejara et al
as 3:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Garbriela Nejara, Karissa Currier, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore v. Deputy Chief Haas
as 2:2023cv01949
Petitioner:
Corves K. Gilmore
Respondent:
Deputy Chief Haas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dumas v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv00589
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Dumas
Defendant:
T. Garrett, K. LeGrand and Venus Fajota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Wake et al
as 3:2023cv00590
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Smith
Defendant:
N. Wake, Tim Garret and K. Shea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. Fishman et al
as 3:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Lorin Fishman, Shannon Romero, Jennifer Kaufman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
