Cases 1 - 10 of 1,731
Ronquillo Bailon v. Professional Contracting and Framing Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv03490
Plaintiff:
Luis Ronquillo Bailon
Defendant:
Professional Contracting and Framing Corp., LI Professional Contracting Corp and Bofinger LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Banurs v. Li Auto Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03470
Plaintiff:
Dinesh Banurs
Defendant:
Li Auto Inc., Xiang Li, Tie Li and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Li v. United Nations et al
as 1:2024cv03289
Plaintiff:
Wen Qin Li
Defendant:
United Nations and World Health Organization
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 in Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Quanzhou Kodyhome Products Co., Ltd. v. Shenzhen Yili Technology Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv03023
Plaintiff:
Quanzhou Kodyhome Products Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Shenzhen Yili Technology Co., Ltd. and Hui Li
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
