Cases 1 - 10 of 3,657
Martin et al v. 49th Street Pizza Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv03450
Plaintiff:
Antonio Flores Martin
Defendant:
49th Street Pizza Corp. d/b/a Famous Original Ray's Pizza, Raymangano 7th Ave. Pizza Corp. d/b/a Famous Original Ray's Pizza, Tony Mangano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Bottoni v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2024cv03315
Plaintiff:
Michael Bottoni
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2024cv03417
Plaintiff:
Janajah Monae Jones
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Morant v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03282
Plaintiff:
Wendy C Morant
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Martin v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Peter John Martin
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johns v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Alvie Johns
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kopp v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Aaron J. Kopp
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Chong v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03351
Plaintiff:
Wei Yung Chong
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martinez v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03259
Plaintiff:
Winston Armando Martinez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Beekman v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Ashley N Beekman
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
