Cases 1 - 10 of 3,757
Kosolapov v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03174
Plaintiff:
Eugene Kosolapov
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
Brianna N. Smith
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rosario v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04863
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Denis Rosario
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miner v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00805
Plaintiff:
Jacob A Miner
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
THURN et al v. BOEING COMPANY (THE) Individually and as Successor to McDonnell Douglas et al
as 1:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
JULIUS THURN and PATRICIA THURN
Defendant:
BOEING COMPANY (THE) Individually and as Successor to McDonnell Douglas, HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORPORATION, LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Individually and as Successor by Merger to Lockheed Corporation, MCDONELL DOUGLASS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Caro Jr. v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04782
Plaintiff:
Domingo Caro Jr.
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Andreano v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04393
Plaintiff:
Michael Andreano
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pacheco Palma v. Artola et al
as 1:2024cv04415
Defendant:
Griselda Artola, Martin Artola, Martins Coffee Cafe Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kengie Pacheco Palma
Ulitto v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03039
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ulitto
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stewart v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03053
Plaintiff:
Winsome Doreen Stewart
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
