Cases 1 - 10 of 12
TYLER v. UNITED STATES ARMY et al
as 1:2021cv02494
Plaintiff:
THYRIS TYLER
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF ARMY, LUAN MAI and UNITED STATES ARMY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
MAYS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2019cv02200
Plaintiff:
TARRA MAYS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv00494
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL
Plaintiff:
NANCY MAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOCKHAM v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv03115
Defendant:
IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
NELLIE MAY DOCKHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARZOLI et al v. RFE/RL, INC.
as 1:2018cv02368
Plaintiff:
Mr. CHRISTOPHER CARZOLI, Mr. DONALD MAY, Mr. MANFRED HANSPETER and others
Defendant:
RFE/RL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
TRAN v. CITIBANK, N.A.
as 1:2015cv01309
Plaintiff:
MAI THI THU TRAN
Defendant:
CITIBANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAYS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2010cv02188
Plaintiff:
DERRICK MAYS
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
TRIMBLE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2010cv00460
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY TRIMBLE
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT, CATHY L. LANIER, JANICE QUINTANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AGUERO et al v. SPOTTS et al
as 1:2008cv00044
Plaintiff:
KELVIN ANDRE SPOTTS, BILLY AGUERO, MARCUS T. ARNOLD and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
KING et al v. MERCK & CO., INC.
as 1:2007cv02275
Plaintiff:
JOHN KING, SYLVESTER LABARTINO, ANITA LONGYEAR-WARD and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
